What do art history and visual arts have in common And Key differences between them

An old picture of a person

Quite a bit, as it turns out. Both disciplines are concerned with the creation, appreciation, and study of works of art. In addition, both fields rely heavily on visual evidence.

Art History

A statue in front of a building

Art history is an academic discipline that studies works of visual art from a critical perspective. Art historians analyze objects in order to understand why they were created, how they were made, what role they played in different societies at different times, and how they evolved over time. A key purpose of studying these objects is to use concrete examples to demonstrate what can be inferred about culture through careful observation. The interpretation of meaning based on evidence is called hermeneutics. Art historians gather this evidence by examining the physical composition of the art object itself, historical documents related to the artwork, and other relevant evidence. Art historians also apply theoretical approaches drawn from other fields in order to enhance their understanding of artworks.

History is one component of an art history education. Art historians rely on information drawn from primary sources (the objects they study) and secondary sources (analysis written by others). They develop critical thinking skills that allow them to draw conclusions about works of art based on analysis rather than emotion or personal taste. A sense of time and place is embedded in all aspects of an art history education because students learn how different societies valued visual culture at various points throughout history. When studying modernism, for example, it is important for students to understand the social and political climates in which the artists worked.

The visual arts,

A large stone building

The visual arts, on the other hand, are the actual practice of creating artwork. This can include everything from painting and sculpture to graphic design and animation. The visual arts encompass a wide range of mediums and disciplines. Unlike art history, there is no one specific way to study the visual arts. Instead, students learn by doing. They experiment with different techniques and mediums, and they develop their own style over time.

Key similarities between art history and the visual arts

Let’s take a closer look at some of the key similarities between art history and the visual arts. First, both disciplines involve the analysis and interpretation of works of art. In order to understand a painting or sculpture, for example, you need to examine its composition, color palette, and technical features. You also need to consider the historical context in which it was created. Both art history and the visual arts are based on aesthetics. Aesthetics is the study of beauty and taste, and it plays a major role in both disciplines. When you’re looking at a work of art, you’re not just examining its technical features; you’re also assessing its aesthetic qualities.

Key differences between art history and the visual arts

However, there are some key differences between art history and the visual arts. Art history is the academic study of art, while visual arts refers to the actual practice of creating artwork. Art history can be studied at the undergraduate or graduate level, while the visual arts are typically studied in undergraduate programs. Master’s and Ph.D. programs in art history are common, but a terminal degree in an artistic discipline is not. There are similarities between art history and studio art, but there are also important differences. Artistic disciplines usually require students to create works of art as part of the program itself, while art historians rarely have the opportunity to create their own artwork.

Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter